2009/10/06

You Call That Extortin'?!

So Letterman was scandalized by a CBS producer, who wanted to extort $2 million bold dollars from the late night host. Wow! Guts, without them Glory ain't as confident a follower. In this case, where there's Guts but no Glory you just walk around with your intestines swinging out your shirt.


David Letterman had to confess to his wife, his sexual affairs so she'd hear it from him. Otherwise, he'd have to pay up to a one, Robert "Joe" Halderman for a golden silence. Letterman had only married his wife a couple of months back but they had been together now for more than 20 years.


Usually I don't care about this kind of thing. Its just gossip to anyone who isn't personally involved. But upon reading an online article I came across the following:


"Shargel said it was unlikely that Halderman would have sought to extort Letterman by taking a $2 million check, because that is not how extortionists normally operate."


Gerald Shargel is Robert "Joe" Halderman's attorney. His statement is priceless, "...because that is not how extortionists normally operate." The fact that this man is questioning the credibility of Letterman's claim by indication of irregularity, by which the crime was executed, is borderline if not fully crossover-ridiculous!


"...How extortionists normally operate."


How they "normally" operate! How do they "normally" operate, Gerry? May I later apologize for Letterman's insensitivity? How dare he accuse your client of such novice and unprofessional styles of extortionism? But in the meantime, could you explain to us in what nature this specific extortion, was abnormal? Because clearly asking for money in exchange for information withheld, isn't enough. No, and of course what would I or Letterman know? We're obviously not extortionists, we're obviously crying wolf, when its just a dog. Will you bring forward for us, Gerry, qualified professionals who will demonstrate for us the correct, "normal" procedure for extorting an individual. Will you clear that for us, Gerry-boy?


I hope America's Next Top Extortionists (ANTE) pay close attention to these proceedings as they may discover that they too may be doing something wrong.

2009/10/04

Spatial Perspectives


The Diary of Anne Frank - (1959) Directed by George Stevens

Starring Millie Perkins, Joseph Schildkraut, Shelley Winters


Great picture. Suspenseful, endearing, and sad. History never truly learns its lesson, so I can't help but imagine what if this were to happen again.


Winner of both Best Art Direction-Set Decoration and Best Cinematography at the 1959 Academy Awards, every scene in this film was so rich; the kiss scene in the shadows between Anna and Peter made one forget they weren't watching a romantic drama. And the magic of Stevens is, I sat there just as suspenseful, waiting for that kiss, as I was when the curious gestapo inspected the office...In fact, I held my breath as if I was there myself.


Millie Perkins is beautiful. I had to say it.



Rear Window - (1954) Directed by Alfred Hitchcock

Starring James Stewart, Grace Kelly


I wish I could erase parts of my memory temporarily, for instance, that Tiny Toons episode where Plucky has a broken leg and they pay homage to Rear Window...Or was that Bart in a Simpsons' episode. In any case I wish the film didn't precede itself so much that I already knew the plot. It still didn't ruin the film for me and I'll tell you why. No one, especially no cartoon can take the place of either James Stewart or Grace Kelly. The latter doesn't even look human, that's how beautiful she is.


I wish I could've met Hitchcock, he seems like the kind of friend I would have; though, he's probably quiet like me so I can't imagine our conversations being that good.

J'aime la Nature!


Bande à Part (Band of Outsiders) - (1964)

Directed by Jean-Luc Godard

Starring Anna Karina, Sami Frey,

Claude Brasseur


I don't, one hundred percent, understand Godard's stories. Yet, they're so addictive. Not to mention they are just so interesting to watch, its like a dream, one that inspires other dreams and other dreams, until they're reality; and like reality, taken for granted.


I have to watch this film again. For some reason I cannot sit and watch any of Godard's work in peace. I'm constantly interrupted or too tired as I attempt too late at night and fail as my sleep succeeds. As a result, today I finally finished what I purchased and began to view, about two weeks back. I think I should make a day of just re-watching all my Godard films.

Dark Matter

My Monthly Aresian Horoscope

March 21 - April 19


So the last few days are part of the last few weeks which make up at least 2 months of general despondency and lack of motivation. I've been crossed by feelings of directionless distress and creative anxiety. However, last night I began what might become the means to pull me out of the overcast gloom. After weeks of searching for inspiration or simply lacking interest in any subject willing to inspire, I now sit with a smile on face and obsession in ears.


I started a soundtrack.


Two pieces yesterday and one today. It feels good, productivity.


So yes, I started a soundtrack. Never mind you that there is no film, neither in the works or in post-production. I have the story in my head and I'm writing it as I go along, the film will be written to the score. I cannot divulge too much as I've noticed in the past that pleasing ideas become less interesting after you share them, they are that less yours and you resent it a bit. All I can say is it'll be titled Cosmonaut and I will find a way to have it available for all who wish to listen.

2009/10/02

October Heart Beats for Emily Deschanel


I think I'm ready to see Emily Deschanel in more film roles. I'm not too interested in TV series, I have never watched a full episode of Bones. I remember her small roles in Spider-man 2 and Cold Mountain, her face is so memorable. In the meantime I really need to find this short film.


That Night - (2005) Directed by Steve Gordon



There must be a site to watch short films, especially by New York based directors. If there isn't I am extremely disappointed. If I weren't such an underachiever I would start one myself, it would probably be a really good idea.

To Be Alive is to Undo Your Belt and Look for Trouble



Lady L - (1965) Directed by Peter Ustinov

Starring Sophia Loren, Paul Newman, David Niven


It was nice to watch. I have to admit that I have yet to find a Sophia Loren film that I love. I might have to check out her italian films or the work she's done with her husband. She is fine, though. And the make-up in this film was really good, for a moment I really thought they casted another woman to play the older Lady L.



Zorba the Greek - (1964) Directed by Mihalis Kakogiannis

Starring Anthony Quinn, Alan Bates, Irene Papas,

Lila Kedrova


Mind versus body. The failings of an intellectual mind is the unwillingness to act, instinctively and without regard for appearance. To selfishly make it a principle to enjoy life and not dress it up behind the cage of a mind. Though I have never read the novel this film is adapted from, much of the themes are also found in the works of two of my favorite authors, Aldous Huxley and D.H. Lawrence.


It was, in fact, the contemporary and friend of the two, Katherine Mansfield, who wrote the following--"Why be given a body if you have to keep it shut up in a case like a rare, rare fiddle?" In this case, a mind.


Anthony Quinn is great as Alexis Zorbas, the free-spirited greek who is loyal, friendly, honest, and despite not being well-read or educated knows a thing or two about life and living it. Alan Bates plays his boss, Basil, a young writer who comes to Crete to start a business in mining and later timber, both with the help of Zorba.


I watched most of this film with the embarrassment of how true it echoed through me, how intelligence is the cast set over the body and its naked desires. Its the same feeling I get when I hear Instinct Blues by The White Stripes, "...'Cause every worm thats under your shoe; and every bird and bug in the jungle, too; and everything in the ocean blue--They just happen to know exactly what to do. So, why don't you?" What good are books and rational thoughts, if you can't go about acting on what you want, when you want it. As Zorba was told by Basil when asked about the practicality of books, "they tell me about the agony of men who can't answer questions like yours." I found myself, during the movie, wishing Basil would act, despite himself, take action and step forward against himself. This, however did not happen and is in fact, the beauty of the story; all the more applying to it, a truthful reflection of real life. In the end, we do begin to sense that Basil's life has been opened towards a new direction and perspective, one that will most likely help shape him into the sort of writer he should strive to be.


Enough about the story, since it is from a good source. Zorba the Greek is also beautiful to look at and listen to. Mikis Theodorakis handled the soundtrack, I remember the name from when I worked in music retail, unfortunately, I never got to experience his music until this film. The film was also wonderfully shot on location on the island of Crete, in black and white, which won Vassilis Fotopoulos an Academy Award for Best Art Direction and Walter Lassally, one for Best Cinematatography.


I'm definitely going to read Nikos Kazantzakis' novel, that is if I ever finish The Tim Drum and a couple of others I have piled up on a waiting list.



No Highway (in the Sky) - (1951) Directed by Henry Koster

Starring James Stewart, Marlene Deitrich, Glynis Johns


Interesting story. Doesn't seem like this film is too celebrated but it wasn't bad. Both supporting role performances were handled well by Marlene Deitrich and Glynis Johns.



A Girl in Every Port - (1952) Directed by Chester Erksine

Starring Groucho Marx, Marie Wilson, William Bendix


A gem. Really fun and ridiculous, this is its aim and it doesn't miss. This is my first Groucho Marx film, so I can't gauge it against his other works. William Bendix is the perfect support for Marx's character, who by the way is named Benjamin Franklin (Benny for short). Bendix as the lovable lug, think Homer Simpson as a sailor, who is conned into buying a horse with his inheritance money left to him by his dead, and apparently quite popular, aunt Gussy. Marx then has to help Bendix get his money back through con after con, that involve horse racing, horse twins, and horse abducting. The film is silly and the story is far from anything you could take serious and so are the characters but I doubt this film was made for any other purpose than to obviously be just that. In all fairness, the film's comedy gives you a parallel world that sucks you in. An example of this, would be the "Beware of Saboteurs!" signs that we see through the harbor scenes. Repeatedly these warnings are presented and when saboteurs indeed do appear, we have no idea that they have anything to do with anything other than the schemes of Marx. You become surprised when anything happens outside of that ridiculous world of Franklin and Dunnovan (Bendix).


I am glad this was my first Groucho Marx film, as it gives me so much more to look forward to, since I'm positive this wasn't Marx at his best. The cast also included Dee Hartford who, in this film, I couldn't help but notice bears a bit of a resemblance to today's Emily Deschanel.

2009/10/01

The Passion Equals the Task


How far would you go for your art? What is enough and who's reception do you seek? For what purpose? There is rivalry, there is obsession, and ultimately, there is sacrifice.


Alfred Borden walks onto the gallows, his last footsteps over the wooden platform, provide for him, the audible announcement of death. He will hang for a crime he is innocent of. And although his last words are a set of syllables that conjunctively make up the magician's command, "abracadabra," he dies.


As you watch The Prestige, if you are at all an artist or creator of one sort or another, you will immediately recognize and identify yourself in these characters. You sympathize with their obsessions and reflect on your own sacrifices for the benefit of that which our Grasp desires to exceed, Imagination. It is this imagination that drives us to creation, and creation in turn strives for perfection.


We are possessed by our need to creatively express and just as important, to be understood. After all, expression is communication and every creation states or reveals to some degree, the mind of its creator. The magic in The Prestige is actively part of the story's narrative, allowing for magic on the stage to set the backdrop for the psychological drives of the protagonists. By this condition, magic graduates to further, subjective or metaphoric terms. Magic is then any form of art or expression, and the magicians, the expressionists.


Robert Angier walks onto the stage before a sold out theatre, each seat occupied for the sole purpose of being entertained by him. He feels their applause and senses their attention, eyes pregnant with wonder, lips parted with a breath not quite ready to escape. In the machine that has made him the best magician in England, he stands. Not knowing what awaits him, a standing ovation or a water tank. In fact, he knows very well that it is actually both that await him. In a matter of a second, he is both standing above his audience and below them. Up towards him, an ascension of cheers, as below he cannot see them, barely are their claps audible, and after his underwater bow, which is no more than a series of struggling jerks and spasms, he dies.


Reoccurring themes of both Christopher and Jonathan Nolan are obsession and duality. Brought on screen by such acclaimed works as Memento, The Dark Knight, and of course, The Prestige. What Memento did for obsession, The Dark Knight did for duality. I feel The Prestige achieves a balance between obsession and duality. Interestingly enough, this median is reflected by the coincidence that The Prestige is The Nolan Brothers' collaboration that, filmographically speaking, stands between Memento and The Dark Knight.


In The Prestige, I sense a personal reference to filmmaking. I also sense in the relationship of Alfred Borden and well, his brother Alfred Borden, a tie to the collaboration between The Nolan Brothers. The film itself is their magic trick, the three-act screenplay is even based on the three elements of the illusion. Angier's showmanship is echoing of a director's need to marvel the eyes of moviegoers, while Borden's boldness and discipline is the spirit of innovation and self-indulging experimentation.


Borden was indeed the natural magician, he was also selfish, as he perfected his craft more for himself than for his audience. The fact that Borden also had a natural double (a twin) reinforced such identification of being the natural, organic performer. This is contrasted by Angier's high-class showsmanship and supernatural clones. This divergence of style, also gives the protagonists different sets of obsessions. Borden is obsessed with being the best magician, ironically his best trick requires he be, instead, one-half of just that. Angiers is obsessed rather, with being the best performer. He simultaneously is also obsessed with authenticity, his early attempts at Borden's Transported Man were never satisfactory to him; as they weren't as Borden had performed them. Borden's obsession, on the other hand, is wrapped in secrecy and deception in order to maintain his place as best magician. This taxes his individuality; he has to share a life, including a wife and mistress. However, secrets are Borden's powers, it is only too apparent the insult paid when Angier, finally revealed as Lord Caldlow, tears Borden's secret without disclosing it, devaluing its worth. Regardless of the cost, the secret kept inflates the illusion's worth. Borden knows this when he informs Sarah's nephew that the secret impresses no one, or when Sarah is explained how the bullet catch is performed, Borden needs to quickly refurnish the unavoidable dangers of such a trick when she mocks the secret's obviousness. Ultimately, what Borden practices is that, illusions require illusions.


This, Angier states, he could never do, lead a false life...later on, when he first duplicates himself, Angier's instinct is immediately to kill the clone, as naturally he could not share the stage. This is where Angier's selfishness manifests, on the stage he must be the only recipient of the applause. "No one cares about the man in the box." What's also interesting to note here is, that every time Angier performs his perfected version of The Transported Man he is committing suicide. As with Mr. Alley's cat in Tesla's Colorado lab, the subject is cloned but the clone appears at a farther distance from the subject, which remains unchanged in appearance or location. On stage, the original subject, Angier, is dropped into the water tank under the stage, while a new clone appears elsewhere in the vicinity. This must be in part, why Angier books a final, limited engagement to perform his illusion. If he is in fact, no longer the original Angier and if, each time the illusion is performed, another clone is killed, the guilt is only so much to bear; it becomes understandable why Angier wouldn't want to continue performing his greatest trick.

At the end, they compare notes and we are asked whose sacrifice was greater. But there is no answer. In Heat it is expressed that the risk is worth the reward. If one is willing to sacrifice the things one values then the reward must be all the more valuable and whatever becomes of the person after such sacrifices, whether good or bad, that person has earned it. A man gets to a certain point, where he deserves the face he wears. This is the price of truth, self-truth and the failure of compromising it. The artists must always remain true to their imagination, to their creativity. All else is for the realm of the spectators and non-participants.